Skip to main content
Start of content
Start of content

441-01585 (Taxation)

Paper petition

Original language of petition: English

Petition to the Government of Canada

WHEREAS:

  • The first carbon tax, including sales tax, will add 41 cents to a litre of gas, the second carbon tax, including sales tax, will add 20 cents to a litre of gas;
  • The combination of carbon tax one and carbon tax two will mean that Canadians pay an extra 61 cents for each litre of gas;
  • Making life more expensive for Canadians in a cost-of-living crisis by implementing a second carbon tax demonstrates how out of touch this Liberal prime minister is; and
  • The Parliamentary Budget Officer confirmed that both carbon taxes will have a net cost of up to $4,000, depending on the province in which they live.

THEREFORE:

We, the undersigned citizens and permanent residents of Canada, call upon the Government of Canada to have the House recognize the failure of carbon tax one and call on the government to immediately cancel carbon tax two (the "Clean Fuel Regulations").

Response by the Minister of Environment and Climate Change

Signed by (Minister or Parliamentary Secretary): The Honourable Steven Guilbeault

The Clean Fuel Regulations (CFR) require gasoline and diesel primary suppliers to reduce the carbon intensity (CI) of the gasoline and diesel they produce and import for use in Canada. The CFR establish a credit market whereby the annual CI reduction requirement could be met via three main categories of credit-creating actions: 

(1) projects that reduce the CI of fossil fuel throughout its lifecycle (e.g., carbon capture and storage)

(2) supplying low-carbon intensity fuels (e.g., ethanol, biodiesel), and 

(3) supplying fuel and energy in advanced vehicle technologies (e.g., electricity for EVs). 

Parties that are not fossil fuel primary suppliers may participate in the credit market as voluntary credit creators by completing certain actions (e.g. low-carbon intensity fuel producers and importers).

The CFR will also create opportunities for voluntary parties and supporting industries. The CFR encourages innovation and growth by increasing incentives for the development and adoption of clean fuels and energy efficient technologies and processes. For example, biofuel producers, which are not regulated under the CFR, will see an increased demand for their product. In turn, biofuel feedstock providers, like farmers and foresters, will also have an economic opportunity.

The Government of Canada expects that impacts on fuel prices from the CFR will be minimal for the next few years, and will increase gradually over time. By 2030, according to the Regulatory Impact Assessment Statement (found at  https://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2022/2022-07-06/html/sor-dors140-eng.html ), Canadians who drive gasoline-powered vehicles may see between an increase in fuel price of $0.06 to $0.13 per litre. However, the final price impacts will depend on refineries. The CFR provides many paths to refineries and importers to clean up the pollution associated with their fuel.

The Parliamentary Budget Officer’s report “A Distributional Analysis of the Clean Fuel Regulations” focused assumed the improbable highest cost scenario where regulated parties meet compliance solely through credit purchases. The report did not take into consideration the economic and environmental benefits that the CFR will have in addition to not considering an updated social cost of carbon. The Government of Canada published an updated social cost of carbon estimate that, if used to model the CFR, would estimate a positive economic benefit from avoiding 26 Mt of greenhouse gas emissions in 2030.

The CFR complements carbon pricing. While carbon pricing creates a broad incentive across the whole economy to use less energy and improve efficiency, the CFR targets transformational changes in how liquid fuels are produced and used in Canada. Actions taken to meet the obligations set by the CFR can also reduce the overall emissions of a refinery, reducing its exposure to federal or provincial carbon pricing systems for industry.

ECCC recommends against simply adding the projected cost impacts of the fuel charge and CFR. The two measures work very differently. In addition, the impact of the CFR on gasoline prices will depend on decisions made by refineries about how to comply.

Presented to the House of Commons
Tracy Gray (Kelowna—Lake Country)
June 21, 2023 (Petition No. 441-01585)
Government response tabled
September 18, 2023
Photo - Tracy Gray
Kelowna—Lake Country
Conservative Caucus
British Columbia

Only validated signatures are counted towards the total number of signatures.