Skip to main content
Start of content
Start of content

432-00381 (Justice)

Paper petition

Original language of petition: English

Petition to the House of Commons in Parliament Assembled

We, the undersigned residents of Canada, draw the attention of the House of Commons to the following:

Whereas the Superior Court of Quebec's recent Truchon decision stated that the condition for euthanasia that death be reasonably foreseeable is unconstitutional;

Whereas the Liberal government made an election commitment to expand access to euthanasia to align with Truchon;

Whereas the government recently offered Canadians a two-week consultation period to gauge the public perspective on expanding access to euthanasia;

Whereas the current safeguards in place are necessary to protect minors, the mentally and chronically ill, people with disabilities, and those who cannot consent from having their lives prematurely terminated;

Whereas the Canadian government should invest in palliative care and support for people with physical and mental disabilities, seeking to preserve life rather than end it.

Therefore, we, the undersigned, urge the Parliament of Canada to ensure that the current safeguards in place for euthanasia are in no way loosened and that access to euthanasia is in no way expanded.

Response by the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada

Signed by (Minister or Parliamentary Secretary): The Honourable David Lametti

On February 24, 2020, the Government of Canada introduced Bill C-7, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying), to amend the provisions related to medical assistance in dying (MAID) in response to the Superior Court of Québec’s September 2019 Truchon decision, and to address issues on which there is emerging societal consensus. On October 5, 2020, the Government re-introduced the Bill.

Our Government believes that those who are experiencing enduring and intolerable suffering from their medical condition – including those who are not approaching the end of life – should be allowed to decide for themselves when they wish to end their life, and that medical and nurse practitioners who are willing to help them have a peaceful and painless death should not be criminally culpable for doing so.

As the Truchon decision applies only in Québec, Bill C-7 proposes to amend the Criminal Code to ensure consistency of the MAID law across the country. The reasonably foreseeable natural death criterion would no longer apply as an eligibility criterion that could exclude persons from obtaining MAID, and would instead be used to determine which of two different sets of safeguards to apply to a particular MAID request.

The Bill’s first set of safeguards would continue to apply to persons whose natural death is reasonably foreseeable, where risks are reduced given the overall proximity of death and the fact that their suffering is most likely linked to the dying process itself. The removal of the requirement of a second independent witness and the repeal of the 10-day reflection period would respond to the concerns raised by patients and their families, healthcare professionals and other stakeholders that these safeguards pose an access barrier to MAID, do not provide protection to vulnerable persons, and unnecessarily prolong patient suffering.

The Bill’s second set of safeguards reflects the more serious consequences of error for persons who request MAID and whose death is not reasonably foreseeable. It recognizes the diverse sources of suffering and vulnerability that could potentially lead a person whose death is not reasonably foreseeable to request MAID. The new safeguards for this group include all of the safeguards that apply to the first group, along with a minimum 90-day assessment period, a requirement for input from a practitioner with expertise in the condition that is causing the person’s suffering, and a requirement to identify, offer and discuss alternative treatments and services with the person.

The amendments proposed in Bill C-7 were informed by consultations held at the beginning of 2020 with Canadians, the provinces and territories, Indigenous groups, stakeholders, experts, and practitioners. The Bill protects vulnerable individuals and the equality rights of all Canadians, while supporting the autonomy of eligible persons to seek MAID.

The current MAID legislation also requires a Parliamentary Review, as well as a review of the state of palliative care in Canada, which was expected to begin in the summer of 2020 but has been delayed as a result of COVID-19’s impact on parliamentary operations.

Presented to the House of Commons
Tamara Jansen (Cloverdale—Langley City)
December 9, 2020 (Petition No. 432-00381)
Government response tabled
January 25, 2021
Photo - Tamara Jansen
Cloverdale—Langley City
Conservative Caucus
British Columbia

Only validated signatures are counted towards the total number of signatures.